开设账户
模拟账户
关于我们
即时报价及新闻
市场分析
财经日历
每日市场分析
交易平台
下载及介绍
使用教学
交易细则
各项细则
资金提存
推广和资讯
常见问题
联络我们
繁
简
EN
客户登入
开设账户
模拟账户
繁
简
EN
客户登入
开设账户
模拟账户
关于我们
上志国际介绍
上志国际优势
即时报价及新闻
即时报价
即时新闻
市场分析
财经日历
市场分析
交易平台
平台特点
平台教学
交易细则
各项细则
资金提存
推广和资讯
常见问题
联络我们
关于我们
交易细则
贵金属市场
交易平台
市场分析
推广和资讯
常见问题
联络我们
繁
简
EN
Baidu (BIDU.O) U.S. premarket trade down 7.5%.
2026-08-18
Baidu (BIDU.O) U.S. premarket trade down 7.5%.
返回
其他消息
2026-08-17
The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) rose for a second session, up 15 points (0.52%) to 2,878 as gains in Capesize freight outweighed weakness in Panamax rates. The Capesize index (BCI) climbed 52 points (1.2%) to 4,590; Capesize daily earnings rose $470 to $38,122. The Panamax index (BPI) fell 22 points (1%) to 2,206, its lowest since Aug. 4; Panamax daily earnings dropped $202 to $19,853. Supramax (BSI) added 6 points (0.4%) to 1,628, a high since July 28. Handysize (BHSI) slipped 2 points to 864.
The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) rose for a second session, up 15 points (0.52%) to 2,878 as gains in Capesize freight outweighed weakness in Panamax rates. The Capesize index (BCI) climbed 52 points (1.2%) to 4,590; Capesize daily earnings rose $470 to $38,122. The Panamax index (BPI) fell 22 points (1%) to 2,206, its lowest since Aug. 4; Panamax daily earnings dropped $202 to $19,853. Supramax (BSI) added 6 points (0.4%) to 1,628, a high since July 28. Handysize (BHSI) slipped 2 points to 864.
2026-08-18
President Trump on Monday threatened to bomb Oman if Oman “blocks” a US-Iran peace deal. Oman, a US partner that has remained neutral in US‑Iran hostilities, controls waters that include parts of the Strait of Hormuz and has been targeted in Iranian attacks Tehran frames as retaliatory strikes. Analysts say a formal Iran‑Oman agreement could conflict with a core US demand — that Iran surrender control of the strait as a condition for ending the war — and could instead formalize and legitimize Ir
President Trump on Monday threatened to bomb Oman if Oman “blocks” a US-Iran peace deal. Oman, a US partner that has remained neutral in US‑Iran hostilities, controls waters that include parts of the Strait of Hormuz and has been targeted in Iranian attacks Tehran frames as retaliatory strikes. Analysts say a formal Iran‑Oman agreement could conflict with a core US demand — that Iran surrender control of the strait as a condition for ending the war — and could instead formalize and legitimize Iranian influence over transit. US anger at being excluded from any agreement is also cited as a driver of the threat. A key unresolved issue is whether Iran would be allowed to levy charges on vessels; international law generally bars transit fees in natural waterways that are not international waters, though states may charge for services such as insurance, environmental protection and port services. It is unclear whether talks would cover fees. Market implications include higher shipping insurance and oil-market risk premia and increased potential for US‑Iran naval confrontation in the Strait of Hormuz.
Chat with us
, powered by
LiveChat