Chinese negotiators say prospects for China‑U.S. AI cooperation are firmer than several months ago and both sides plan to advance concrete issues at the November dialogue. They identified three realistic areas for progress: first, agree AI risk classification and tiering—clarify what constitutes a major risk and which model behaviours amount to severe loss of control, as a precondition for more complex rules. Second, finalize scope, timelines and requirements for AI incident notification—establi

2026-10-02

Chinese negotiators say prospects for China‑U.S. AI cooperation are firmer than several months ago and both sides plan to advance concrete issues at the November dialogue. They identified three realistic areas for progress: first, agree AI risk classification and tiering—clarify what constitutes a major risk and which model behaviours amount to severe loss of control, as a precondition for more complex rules. Second, finalize scope, timelines and requirements for AI incident notification—establishing a communication channel must be backed by rules on which events must be reported, reporting deadlines, what information is shared and remedies for non‑compliance. Third, place AI governance within a broader China‑U.S. exchange framework to ensure fuller Chinese participation and broader international input.